Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kollibri terre Sonnenblume's avatar

"I'm not worried about being too Utopian, I'm worried we aren't being Utopian enough." -- I couldn't agree more. Too often, especially in environmental circles, we start the negotiation with what we think we can get, not what is actually needed. Then what we end up with is even more sorely lacking.

Expand full comment
George Price's avatar

I am truly delighted whenever I see that someone has refused to accept the misinformed concept that "utopias" are impossible dreams about perfect societies that can never exist. Well, who do you think worked so very hard at creating that unnecessary barrier against revolutionary thinking that could lead to radical progressive change? I know, from extensive research, that it was not Sir Thomas More, the man who actually coined the term, "utopia." Nowhere in More's classic novel, “A little, true book, not less beneficial than enjoyable, about how things should be in a state and about the new island Utopia,” does More claim that Utopia is defined as either "impossible" or "perfect." What More was actually writing about (back in 1516) was the possibility of creating better, or more ideal societies, instead of resigning ourselves to accepting and following the unjust, eco-destructive, or even dystopian societies that we are born into or cast into, without any choice or say in the matter. I wrote an essay on this topic a couple of years ago that you might find interesting or useful. Here is a link to it: https://learningearthways.net/2021/12/13/paths-forward-in-defense-of-utopian-creativity/

Thank you, Erin, for helping us to break free from such delusion and do more of the creative, "utopian" thinking and actual work that our current global predicament cries out for us to do at this time.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts